TwitterFacebookRSSHomeNewsReviewsHow-tosAppsDeals About us / contacts » Send us a tipTop storiesiOS 5 Beta 6 Is Out, Get Downloading! Here’s The Full Changelog
AT&T’s Vice President Says iPhone 5 is Coming October, Prepares to Get ‘Really, Really Busy’
Steve Jobs Releases Taiwanese Self-Help Book For Teenagers Translated By Dead Avant Garde Composer [Humor]
Who Killed HP’s PCs, Phones and Tablet?
Filter posts by: Mac iOS Hardware SoftwareApple Starts Process To Yank Developer Access To UDID in iOS 5 [Privacy]ShareTweet By David W. Martin (8:03 pm, Aug. 19, 2011)
There are a lot of changes being made by Apple to iOS 5. Each new beta reveals a little more about the changes everyone can expect after iOS 5 is released to the public in a few months. There is one big change that Apple hasn’t said a lot about publicly and developers might be surprised by it.
Apple has notified developers via a recent update to iOS 5 documentation that they will be removing access to the unique device identifier (UDID) on the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad.
Although this probably doesn’t sound like much to most of you reading this it is very important. The UDID identifies users for a variety of reasons that include, but are not limited to: mobile ad tracking, gaming (scores, etc.), and just for identifying a device and later its user. This will be a big issue for developers who’re going to be forced to come up with their own way of uniquely identifying users. If you are privacy fanatic this is good for you, but developers will effectively lose all their historical data and they will just have to start collecting it all over again.
According to TechCrunch here is the language from the Apple Developer documentation:
Deprecated in iOS 5.0
uniqueIdentifier
An alphanumeric string unique to each device based on various hardware details. (read-only) (Deprecated in iOS 5.0. Instead, create a unique identifier specific to your app.)
We agree with TechCrunch that this looks like Apple’s response to privacy concerns or just a way to prevent them. That isn’t a bad thing. We know that many people aren’t all that excited about their UDIDs being used to target them for advertising. However, although Apple is removing UDID access from developers there isn’t any evidence that Apple won’t still be using it for Game Center, iAds, or other reasons.
So what do you say developers is this a big deal or isn’t it?
[via TechCrunch]
21 comments »Related stories from Cult of MacApple And App Makers Sued Over Passing UDIDs To AdvertisersDevelopers Are Linking UDIDs With Millions of Facebook Accounts… And Apple Doesn’t CareReport: Apple Thwarting Developers That Sell iOS 5 Beta Install SlotsEarly Jailbreak Software For iPhone 4.0 Beta Is AvailableGoogle Chrome for Mac is a Hack If you enjoyed this article:Subscribe via RSS or email, or follow us on Facebook and TwitterAbout the author

David W. Martin has more than 20 years of experience in the industry as a programmer, systems and business analyst, author, and consultant. David has written for CNET's iPhoneatlas.com and MacLife.com he currently writes for CultofMac.com and BYTE.com. He comes to Cult of Mac's website with deep knowledge and passion for the all things Apple. Follow David on Twitter @david_w_martin.
Email the author | Read more posts by David W. Martin.
Posted in Apple, iOS, News | Comment on this article http://twitter.com/AndreGSNE Andre GohApple is just killing themselves by doing this.
Prof. PeabodyBecause people like having their privacy violated? Your not making sense. The developers and advertisers that want to track people online are not Apple’s customers, their victims are.
AnonymousDevelopers can create their own UUID. Use the Serial number, Mac Address, or any other unique id.
Jose RodriguezIf people wanted privacy, they wouldn’t be using the internet or any of it’s services..
http://twitter.com/baby_Twitty baby TwittyI would say its a big deal for developers who are evil and want to track their targeted customers/victims.
But overall for most honest developers, its not, as there is a work-around for them to track app data without UUID.
and so i’m all for Apple’s initiative to try to restrict UUID access to developers.
so that they can only track the app usage and not so much the user.
http://twitter.com/AndreGSNE Andre Gohhmmn…i wonder if apple stopped jailbreaking altogether,would their sales go down?they seem to be more and more protective.
http://twitter.com/ereins158 Josh SteinbergIt’s UDID, not UUID. And developers should have never been able to access UDID’s from the start. They’ll release updates to their apps, and people won’t know the difference, so they shouldn’t make a huge deal about it now.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AZ4KVT66N7PJ6WDSY26RU35I4Q DavidWhen you buy a car do you immediately want to change it, modify it just because you can? Duh? Many folks just want a solid device that works, who cares about special options that the jailbreaker seem to insist upon. Security, system integrity, not having to fix, fix, fix, wonder why doesn’t this work now, etc. Some of us just don’t want the hassle.
AnonymousThanks Josh – fixed that. Long day and way toooo many acronyms in my life.
AnonymousThis is not a smart move for Apple. That seems to be a trend for them lately. Lying in court, suing everything that moves, etc.
http://bit.ly/dI3hcF
AnonymousGood point David. You’ll always have modders but they make up a minority of the customer base. I also think Apple closing down jailbreak vectors has less to do with preventing jailbreaking than with fixing security vulnerabilities. That said, I think manufacturers should leave jailbreaking communities alone as they’re a good potential innovation sandbox and can be learned from. Sony’s position on suing modders is just stupid and has alienated a particularly passionate branch of their user community.
Prof. PeabodyIsn’t it kind of ironic that you’re basically calling Apple out for immoral behaviour but at the same time you’re spamming the comments list with an ad for your site?
Jose RodriguezYou missed the entire point of his post. NO, everyone does not have an urge to modify their car, but he was talking about the ABILITY to. What if you couldn’t change your own tires or oil? What if you couldn’t clean the inside of your car? What if everytime you wanted to do something you were forbidden?
THAT is what he is talking about. I have a firm belief that while the general population would not be affected by a jailbreak shutout, it would drive a noticeable portion away.
Jose RodriguezYou missed the entire point of his post. NO, everyone does not have an urge to modify their car, but he was talking about the ABILITY to. What if you couldn’t change your own tires or oil? What if you couldn’t clean the inside of your car? What if everytime you wanted to do something you were forbidden?
THAT is what he is talking about. I have a firm belief that while the general population would not be affected by a jailbreak shutout, it would drive a noticeable portion away.
Alexander Maxhamhttp://www.iosempire.com/2011/08/ios-5-beta-6-works-with-the-existing-jailbreak-tools/
http://twitter.com/BozoWo BozoiPhone Pro and iPad Pro to be launched soon? hell yea!
read it, and understand why.
http://wp.me/p1Mrnd-1i
the Bozo.
AnonymousThere is no way to totally stop jail breaking. Even if they gave in and let every app on the devices, even if they were unlocked from day one, someone would find a reason to want to jailbreak and do it
And when Apple closes a hole, they will find another
Anonymoustinyurl.com/2df4ccp
Anonymousadda
http://twitter.com/AndreGSNE Andre GohDo you know why i bought a iTouch?it’s because of the community.millions of people have an ios device.Frankly,i find the games boring after a while.Jailbreaking gives me the convienence and entertainment that i want.example,itunes,to put a song,i have to plug it into the com and before that it has to sync?what trouble.my itouch just needs to download a song from safari,then i can just import it into my ipod library.To me,if i couldn’t jailbreak,i wouldn’t have paid for it.
AnonymousI just p a i d $21.87 for an i P a d 2-64GB and my boyfriend loves his Panasonîc Lumîx GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS.I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $657 which only cost me $62.81 to buy.
Here is the website we use to get it all from,http://bit.ly/PeNNyBid
HandStand Case for iPad 2 Is Fitting for Those on Their Feet [Review]
App For iPad 2 Lets You Paint Your Surroundings With Video
Canopy Kapok iPhone Case & Stand: Too Little, Too Late [Review]
More reviews »Latest Cult of Mac how-tosMake The Most Out Of Preview In OS X Lion [Video How-To]
No HDMI Sound Under OS X Lion Using A Mini DisplayPort or Thunderbolt Adapter? There’s An Easy Fix For That [How-To]
How to Get Google+ Running in Your Mac’s Menubar
How to Change the Scrolling Direction in Lion [OS X Tips]
More how-tos »We have dynamic hosting in the cloud!Cult of Mac's website is hosted on a dynamic cloud cluster from Scalr
TwitterFacebookRSSCult of MacCult of Mac is daily news website that tracks Apple and the people who use its products. Our goal is to provide timely news, insightful analysis, helpful how-tos and honest product reviews about Apple and Apple-related products. Find out more about Cult of Mac.
Contact Cult of Mac» Email a tip» Advertising info» Email the webmasterLatest newsApple Starts Process To Yank Developer Access To UDID in iOS 5 [Privacy]Get’em While They Are Hot HP TouchPads Starting At $99 [Liquidation]This Digital Toolbox Lets You Fix All The Little Things In OS X Lion That Annoy YouApple Was Worth More Than All The Banks In Europe Earlier TodayLatest reviewsGriffin IntelliCase for iPad 2: Maybe the Best iPad 2 Case Yet [Review]HandStand Case for iPad 2 Is Fitting for Those on Their Feet [Review]App For iPad 2 Lets You Paint Your Surroundings With VideoCanopy Kapok iPhone Case & Stand: Too Little, Too Late [Review]Top Cult of Mac tagsNewsReviewsHow-tosDealsOpinionsAppleMaciOSSteve JobsiPhoneiPadiPodMacBookiMacGamesAppsHardwareJailbreakCult of Mac © Cultomedia Corp 2009–2011. All rights reserved | About us | Advertising | Privacy | Powered by WordPress | Dynamic cloud hosting by Scalr.net
No comments:
Post a Comment